Return to CreateDebate.comjcdebate • Join this debate community

Jacky's debate group



Welcome to Jacky's debate group!

Jacky's debate group is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic


RSS JackyChow

Reward Points:22
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
85%
Arguments:12
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Let us not forget the “Is-Ought” problem pointed out by philosopher David Hume. That is, we cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”. We cannot simply say that U/S “is” effective or “is not” effective based on what we feel “ought” to be a good or bad outcome. To claim that "improved healing" or "return to function" is a positive outcome is only to suggest that people “ought” to be healthy and “ought” to return to function. This claim is purely based on your own opinions. Who’s to say that it is wrong for a patient to wish to be “not healthy” or wish to “never return to full function”? To push your personal ideals on others is wrong. We must therefore conceit that this conversation is completely pointless and has no answer.

2 points

This is an excellent question! If we were talking about a medication and not ultrasound then animal studies would certainly not cut it. So why is it that we are ok with proceeding just on scientific theory or animal studies? I would be interested in getting peoples thoughts on this.

1 point

Unfortunately many of the studies on ultrasound have a fair share of flaws. This of course means that many of systematic reviews are just compilations of mostly lower quality studies. Good quality RCTs are definitely needed.

1 point

This is an excellent point. If U/S was proven to be completely ineffective then we would be faced with a difficult ethical decision as to whether we should be using U/S with the only effect being a placebo effect. This however is not the case - we have some plausible therapeutic effects on top of the plausible placebo effect. Seems like a good use of time.

1 point

Post on behalf of Alice Chan:

Even the evidence is not clear for a lot of modalities, all modalities should have a place in physical therapy as long as they do no harm. Research shows that simple interactions with a healthcare worker have placebo effect on patients. Modalities could also have similar placebo effects. This positive psychological experience alone can be a "therapeutic" benefit.

Plus, many patients do not like exercises or do not follow their exercise prescriptions; modalities can serve as an incentive to keep a patient seeing a physiotherapist and to exercise inside the clinic.

2 points

Sure there is evidence but as pointed out by Kiera, much of this is from animal studies. We need supporting clinical trials on humans to support our actions.

0 points

Hello,

I would like to clarify that ultrasound does not actually serve as an anti-inflammatory agent. This is something that has confused me in the past as well. It turns out that ultrasound is actually pro-inflammatory. This is not to say it is not useful in the inflammatory phase as it may help in optimizing the inflammatory phase of healing.

2 points

I support the use of ultrasound. I use it on a regular basis as an anti-inflammatory agent and have found it to be very effective.

3 points

There is no supporting evidence for the use of ultrasound. To use ultrasound is to ignore the principles of evidence based practice.

1 point

EBP is more than just literature. We must not lose sight of the other components of EBP, namely the patient and the clinician.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: U/S has no role in PT

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here