Jacky's debate group is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Ardrum
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
I disagree. Lack of supporting evidence in this case does amount to evidence against US since the burden of proof is on the claim that US is not only effective, but also worth the opportunity cost of not being able to use alternative, more active interventions during a treatment session due to the time wasted on US. What criteria would you accept as evidence against the effectiveness of US or any other treatment intervention? If an intervention can not be demonstrated scientifically to provide a significant benefit besides placebo (for how PTs typically utilize US), then what else would you need to see as evidence against it?
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
